Thursday 29 December 2011

The Unexpected Purchase Undermining Breastfeeding

I would never in a million years have thought that, by purchasing a tin of baked beans or a squeeze-tube of ketchup, I would be supporting an industry that serves as a booby-trap for society, undermining the importance of breastfeeding world-wide. Yet, that is exactly what happens when one purchases Heinz.

The H.J. Heinz company, most famous for it's world-renowned Ketchup, violates the World Health Organisations' International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, as well as UNICEF's infant feeding code, in several ways:

Heinz produces baby food in the age range of 4-6 months. However; the World Health Organisation, along with several other health organisations worldwide, recommend that children be fed exclusively on breastmilk or infant formula until at least 6 months of age, when a childs' digestive system and motor skills have developed enough to allow him or her to self-feed.

Heinz strongly discourages baby-led weaning, claiming that when children self-feed, there is no way to ensure that they meet nutritional guidelines, despite WHO's stance that "food before one is just for fun". In the article linked, the company also falsely claims that there is an increased risk of choking with baby-led weaning. However, babies are indeed less likely to choke when self feeding, as a child is not capable of moving food from the front to the back of the mouth before learning first to chew.

In addition; Heinz also claims through false studies that children whose parents do not follow an authorative style of parenting and feeding will suffer from inadequate diets, reduced intake of fruits and vegetables and a lowered consumption of nutrients.

Despite this, Heinz claims that it is necessary to feed a child cereals and other foods which have been fortified with iron and other nutrients. Feeding a child, especially one who is under six months of age, iron supplements has been shown to lower the efficiency of his or her iron absorption.

Ironically, Heinz controlled over 29% of the global infant food market in 1994; including infant formulas-despite the fact that infants fed on cows' milk are more likely to fall into the high risk category of developing anemia.

Heinz distributes a nutritional guide to Chinese Hospitals labelled "A Good Start" which illegally claims that breastmilk will not meet the nutritional needs of babies past 4 months of age. Their infant formula company, Farleys', distributes similar booklets in the United Arab Emirates. In doing so, they violate their own companys' Global Code Of Conduct, stating that "all communications must be honest, truthful and not misleading."

As if this were not enough to dissuade you from supporting the company, the Advertising Standards Agency of Great Britain has reprimanded Heinz for claims that the ASA deems unsubstantiated: that Nurture brand infant formula would "protect" a childs' immune system, help eyes and brain "develop", and provide nourishment with milk proteins and calcium.

Heinz has also had product recalls, including their strained meats baby foods, for deformities in the products' glass which could break off during "normal" use.

When you make a purchase, your money acts as a vote for the company whose products you consume. Whenever a product is purchased, it acts as an indicator to the store to continue stocking this product, indeed buying it more frequently when demand runs strong, and so in buying from a company whose ethics you do not support provides them with your endorsement. This is why we, as a culture of consumers, must be informed and aware of the choices we make.

Thursday 1 December 2011

The Great Vaccine Debate

"Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection" - Dr Sabin, developer of the Polio vaccine(1).


The fact of the matter is; vaccines are not nearly as effective as elected health officials would lead you to believe. Many parents fear for the safety of their vaccinated children: they are genuinely worried that unvaccinated children will cause an outbreak of disease. "While parents may think it does no harm to others if their kids skip some vaccines, they are in fact putting others at risk, health officials say. No vaccine is completely effective(2)." So then; what is the point?

Many parents genuinely believe that they are acting in a child's best interest by inoculating them against disease; many of which have been nearly eradicated. The fact of the matter is; this is simply not true. Preliminary studies have proven that people are just as likely to fall just as ill with, for example, a flu vaccine than the actual flu itsself(3). Not only this; but as viruses are consistently mutating by changing in composition, there is no way to guarantee protection from any virus. In a mere manner of months (or less), the strain of any particular virus will have mutated so much as to be entirely unrelated to the original particle. There are so many mutations possible; that no amount of vaccination, even if you were to inoculate yourself/your child every week, could avoid your exposure to the virus in question (3). This does not simply apply to the flu; however-this truth extends to all viruses, including Human Pappilomavirus, Measles, Rubella, Chickenpox, Mumps, and even the common 24-hour Cold virus; for which a vaccine is currently being developed.

So, why is this information not widely distributed?
To put this answer very simply; doctors are given incentives-by both drug companies and insurance companies-to give out vaccines(4)(5). In fact; they even get larger bonuses if they can vaccinate, and fully vaccinate, a large majority of the population(5)! This alone makes it an unlikely fact that your doctor will educate you about the risks involved in vaccination; let alone provide you with the actual patient product information leaflets, such as the PPI for Gardasil, which lists in black and white all of the side effects and incidences related with the vaccine: "General disorders and administration site conditions: Asthenia, chills, death, fatigue, malaise." Yes; you read that correctly...death. It is no small wonder that the majority of doctors do not wish this to be widely known when you consider their incentives; which range from gifts and holidays to cold hard cash.

The long and short of it all is that vaccines are not safe. Vaccines are administered in order to stimulate an immune response to the dead viral particles they contain; however they also contain toxic levels of aluminum which has been proven to be linked directly to many ailments including, but not limited to allergies, asthma and inflammatory bowel disease(6). Also included in vaccinations are formaldehyde, antibiotics, egg proteins (which many people are allergic to; but are not informed that this is in the vaccines they are receiving!), MSG, Thimerosal (a mercury-containing preservative)(7), yeast proteins (another which many people have severe allergic reactions to)(8) aborted foetal tissue DNA(9) and many other unsavoury ingredients. In fact, babies who are vaccinated according to schedule are injected with 5 milligrams of alluminum by the age of 18 months-which is 50 times the FDA's recommendations for safe levels of aluminum exposure for adults!  (10)

According to Richard D Moskovitz, M.D., the price we pay for those antibodies (contained within vaccines) is the persistence of virus elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently. In turn, our immune systems are inhibited from providing an effective defense against natural viral particles we may encounter(11). In fact, you can even get a virus simply from RECEIVING the vaccination itself which is admitted to even by the vaccine manufacturers themselves(12)! This is, not to mention the fact that the death toll of many diseases began decreasing before their vaccine counterparts became available for widespread use(13).

The fact of the matter is, our bodies ARE equipped immunologically to prevent us from disease(14). It is only through poor diet, lack of or premature weaning from breastfeeding (15), pollution, lack of proper hygiene, a sedentary lifestyle and yes, vaccine exposure that our immune systems are compromised and we become susceptible to disease. 

What reason then remains, for getting vaccinated or vaccinating your children? 

If you or your child have fallen ill as the direct result of a vaccine injury, you are entitled to monetary compensation. Please visit here for more information if you are located in the United Kingdom.



REFERENCES:

1. http://www.planetc1.com/search/more-vaccine-quotes-from-the-outside-in.html

2. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45462083/ns/health-childrens_health/#.TtXRG7KImU8

3. http://chemistry.about.com/cs/howthingswork/a/aa011604a.htm

4. http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/vaccines/do-doctors-have-financial-incentive-get-their-patients-fully-vaccinated

5. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1226704/GPs-bigger-bonuses-meet-swine-flu-jab-targets.html

6. http://www.nvic.org/Doctors-Corner/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx

7. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm

8. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_ppi.pdf

9. http://www.vaccinetruth.org/fetal_tissue.htm

10. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp22-c2.pdf

11. http://www.consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=19990809220922

12. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/z/zostavax/zostavax_pi2.pdf

13. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/

14. http://www.allergytherapeutics.com/natural-immunity.aspx

15. http://www.jaoa.org/content/106/4/203.full